LITTLE HITLER
Never has a man embodied this phrase more than Von Smallhausen.
The department was greeted this morning with a stern word on breach of the 'Clean Desk Policy'. At one point he muttered 'this is serious'. On what scale you fucking bald twat? Yasser Arafat's methods may have been questionable but at least his cause was based on a noble premise. Von Smallhausen slavishly and blindly devotes himself to a large corporation. Pathetic. Sad. Little. Man. Go fuck yourself.
Email conversation that followed the 'lecture':
-----Original Message-----
From: BARDER
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:16
To: HOLT
Subject:
It's Serious
-----Original Message-----
From: HOLT
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:23
To: BARDER
Subject: RE:
if you needed any further proof what an utter t1t VS is then there it was.
completely ridiculous overreaction. when was the last time we had a security breach? does he seriously believe that someone from *RIVAL BANK* is going to infiltrate building 8 to get the latest management accounts.
unnecessary lecture on how to observe the clean desk policy. we know how it works baldie WE JUST CANT BE FU(KED WITH IT
-----Original Message-----
From: BARDER
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:29
To: HOLT
Subject: RE:
Indeed - firm proof that he is an utter be11 end - *BANK* through and through. That makes me sick.
Bet any money he is doing the same thing in 3 months time when we have all forgotten about this "lecture"
My money is that around 8.30 last night, when he was the only idiot here, he did the full check after being disgusted at the state of someone's desk (most likely SOCKS). I would love to see hidden camera footage of the reaction - probably on his knees with his head in his hands shouting "Why?"
-----Original Message-----
From: HOLT
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:36
To: BARDER
Subject: RE:
my desk was in breach of policy as it had the following items on it:
two biros
a calculator
a birthday card
some pistachio nuts
a bog roll
imagine what *RIVAL BANK* could have achieved with that haul of booty.
total lack of humour. what always gets me is that he has a vague awareness for the necessity of humour. he, himself, doesn't see the need for it and hasnt got a sense of humour but he pathetically tries to be light hearted, not to be funny, just because it is the convention.
-----Original Message-----
From: BARDER
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:39
To: HOLT
Subject: RE:
I know - would you prefer to have a funny man or a good boss. With him they are very definitely not mutually exclusive - neither are attainable. Him at the Christmas do will be a joke - trying to crack gags and give free drinks tokens. Just stick to the drinks tokens VS.
*BIRD* had a look at what was on *ANOTHER BIRD'S* desk and just proclaimed - "What a w*nker"
Never has a man embodied this phrase more than Von Smallhausen.
The department was greeted this morning with a stern word on breach of the 'Clean Desk Policy'. At one point he muttered 'this is serious'. On what scale you fucking bald twat? Yasser Arafat's methods may have been questionable but at least his cause was based on a noble premise. Von Smallhausen slavishly and blindly devotes himself to a large corporation. Pathetic. Sad. Little. Man. Go fuck yourself.
Email conversation that followed the 'lecture':
-----Original Message-----
From: BARDER
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:16
To: HOLT
Subject:
It's Serious
-----Original Message-----
From: HOLT
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:23
To: BARDER
Subject: RE:
if you needed any further proof what an utter t1t VS is then there it was.
completely ridiculous overreaction. when was the last time we had a security breach? does he seriously believe that someone from *RIVAL BANK* is going to infiltrate building 8 to get the latest management accounts.
unnecessary lecture on how to observe the clean desk policy. we know how it works baldie WE JUST CANT BE FU(KED WITH IT
-----Original Message-----
From: BARDER
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:29
To: HOLT
Subject: RE:
Indeed - firm proof that he is an utter be11 end - *BANK* through and through. That makes me sick.
Bet any money he is doing the same thing in 3 months time when we have all forgotten about this "lecture"
My money is that around 8.30 last night, when he was the only idiot here, he did the full check after being disgusted at the state of someone's desk (most likely SOCKS). I would love to see hidden camera footage of the reaction - probably on his knees with his head in his hands shouting "Why?"
-----Original Message-----
From: HOLT
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:36
To: BARDER
Subject: RE:
my desk was in breach of policy as it had the following items on it:
two biros
a calculator
a birthday card
some pistachio nuts
a bog roll
imagine what *RIVAL BANK* could have achieved with that haul of booty.
total lack of humour. what always gets me is that he has a vague awareness for the necessity of humour. he, himself, doesn't see the need for it and hasnt got a sense of humour but he pathetically tries to be light hearted, not to be funny, just because it is the convention.
-----Original Message-----
From: BARDER
Sent: 12 November 2004 09:39
To: HOLT
Subject: RE:
I know - would you prefer to have a funny man or a good boss. With him they are very definitely not mutually exclusive - neither are attainable. Him at the Christmas do will be a joke - trying to crack gags and give free drinks tokens. Just stick to the drinks tokens VS.
*BIRD* had a look at what was on *ANOTHER BIRD'S* desk and just proclaimed - "What a w*nker"
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home